Chris wrote: > Have you posted your source for the Qt binding? I'm > interested in seeing how it's done so I can make one for FLTK. No, for 3 reasons: 1) My work is done for a commercial company and we don't have a policy of making our source "open" (yet). That said, the Qt bindings are not exactly our core business, and I'm entertaining an idea of bringing them to the community, if there's enough interest. It could even possibly help us to maintain them. But I don't expect a decision on that anytime soon. 2) It's not in a state that would be easy to publish (i.e. there are no installers and make scripts, only a percentage, albeit substantial, of classes are covered, it's done against Qt 4.8.1, although it would probably work with older versions, and currently it works for msvc2005 compiler symbol mangling scheme, although it is not hard to extend it for other compilers like gcc). 3) It requires a hacked version of LuaJIT FFI that enables the implicit conversions (the topic of this thread). That said, I'm more than happy to swap ideas, so if you have concrete questions or suggestions, we can discuss them here. --Janis