> > I'm looking this from the other way. I have no real need to use the > API, but I'm thinking of what would be required to get luaffi to > support it as well. There are aspects of that API which I couldn't > > That is actually an interesting way of evaluating an API, I see where you're coming from. Imo, use cases of reflection/introspection are hardly classifiable as they tend to open up the language instead of adding to it. It`s typically an area where unexpected awesomeness can happen - it it isn`t limited.