On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Coda Highland <chighland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Most > binaries linked against musl libc will continue to work if libc.so is > suddenly replaced with glibc Okay, so I'm slightly wrong about this, the relationship is one-way; musl-linked binaries aren't compatible with glibc due to glibc pulling some not-quite-POSIX stunts in its header files. But the other way around does work, and it's fully possible to provide a binary that works with both libc implementations without recompilation. /s/ Adam