RE: [ANN] Quick and dirty way to get LuaJIT binaries for Windows
- From: William Adams <william_a_adams@xxxxxxx>
- To: "luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:59:34 +0000
When I was wet behind the ears programming with Lua (last year), LFW was a
godsend. All sorts of stuff already in the box.
It took me about 4 months to ween myself from it.
I think Lua For Windows, that allows you to easily replace Lua for LuaJIT would
be a good product to have.
I see this daily build effort as something slightly different. Rather than
taking the "kitchen sink included" approach of LFW, this is just a nightly
build of whatever is in the repository, plus a little tiny bit (lpeg).
Lua For Windows presents a bit too much for those who might have fairly minimal
needs, but is certainly a good playground for anyone who wants to play with
everything Lua has on offer. The main problem is, keeping all the various
packages up to date is rather a pain.
-- William
===============================
- Shaping clay is easier than digging it out of the ground.
----------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:08:59 +0100
> From: fmdspam@xxxxxxxxx
> To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Quick and dirty way to get LuaJIT binaries for Windows
>
> Egor,
>
> once started, your efforts may end in something like "LuaJIT for Windows" ?!
> Wouldn't it be nice to combine the work with "Lua for Windows"
> (http://code.google.com/p/luaforwindows/) somehow?
> (just rambling)
> --Frank
>
>
Other related posts:
