[lit-ideas] Re: with or without Bush
- From: Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:19:17 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
-----Original Message-----
From: Scribe1865@xxxxxxx
Sent: Aug 2, 2004 7:51 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] with or without Bush
Stan maintains that if Bush had not been in office, Bin Laden would have been
captured. As if a change of presidents could alter tactical and strategic
factors that work to Bin Laden's benefit. Taken as a statement of convictions,
Stan's hyperbole is hunky-dory. Taken as a tactical prediction . . . well . . .
it's a fine statement of convictions.
A.A. Eric, are you that much of a fatalist? Is Bin Laden that much in control
that if another president had pursued him instead of Iraq, with the world's
support, nothing would be different?
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
