Marlena ponders: >> The concept of 'in the eye of the beholder', though, is one to ponder. Is >> it possible that what, for me, makes someone 'kind' is not 'kind' to someone >> else? << Not only possible, but for certain, I'd say. Only look to the Schiavo case for confirmation. "Whose standards?", Paul Stone demands to know. One's own, of course. I agree with Paul that virtue is a judgment made about others, and made according to one's own notions of virtue. To consider oneself virtuous is almost an oxymoron and we all know what morons oxen are. If you etymologize 'virture' -- as opposed to 'excellence' another translation of Greek 'arete' -- you find the Roman notion of 'manliness' all mixed in, which, I assume, has nothing to do with penis size but with courage -- we all know what cowards women are, don't we? And on my part, I confess a prejudice against declaring something action virtuous if there's no cost in it to the actor. Christopher Hitchen's is not a virtuous person, in my book. Is Mother Teresa? I don't know. Closer to it than Christopher, for sure, but I'd admire her more if she had been an atheist doing her work solely for the benefit of humanity. But even with her faults she certainly outshines me in her works of charity. I dasn't judge her. Marlena's pondering whether a man who abandoned his family to do charitable works would be virtuous? Certainly not in my judgment. But didn't Jesus called for us to leave our families and follow him. So Jesus might find such a person virtuous. But then Jesus and I differ on a lot of things. But I'm sure he doesn't vote Republican, so I can forgive him some of his foibles. And alas, no one is virtuous, but always only becoming virtuous so sayeth the Socrates. Mike Geary Memphis ----- Original Message ----- From: Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 12:51 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: virtue-practical example of being taught In a message dated 1/1/2006 12:35:10 P.M. Central Standard Time, pas@xxxxxxxx writes: Muslim extremists would agree with the boy scouts. Which goes to show that 'virtuous' actions are in the eye of the beholder. Hi, Do you think the word "kind" fits in within the Muslim extremist viewpoint? It's a huge one within Boy Scouts. (as is the 'do a good turn daily") Or, "friendly" or "helpful" or "courteous"? Within Girl Scouts, there is the "considerate and caring" as well as "friendly and helpful". Those all seem to not be there within a Muslim extremist viewpoint... The dream of the scouting movement was that if all embraced those qualities, there would not be things like war--there would be 'common ground' and understanding. I grant you--it was at the end of his life when Baden-Powell saw what happened within WWII and he was absolutely appalled and his heart was broken. Would a person, in Mikey's viewpoint, who joined Doctors without Borders and who left all the time to ''save the world" but leaving spouse/kids alone when maybe at least one of the kids desperately needed that second parents 'around' (love language of 'time', I would say--for words of affirmation could now be given over the phone, acts of service kid would understand the same, etc. "Time" and "Touch" however are harder to replace from a distance...) At that point, one wonders at the value of virtue which is touching/saving other parts of the world but not one own's home world. I know it CAN be done--but it is harder depending on how it is communicated to those in one's life. And, if one focuses on being a doctor in one own's community because of the issue of having a spouse or child who could not handle him/her being gone--is that person less virtuous if he/she stays home, makes lots of $$ but also shares with others in one's own community his/her expertise, money? [and maybe is one of the main supporters of his/her friend who is involved in Doctors Without Borders...] Lots to think about, Marlena in Missouri