[lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te
- From: John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Lit-Ideas <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:03:23 +0900
Robert, please explicate. I could see my question as Socratic. Not quite
sure why it makes me a Platonist.
John
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But that first thought opened the way to another, perhaps more
>> interesting thought. What, philosophically speaking, counts as a mistake?
>>
>
> I hadn't realized you were a Platonist, John.
>
> RP
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit
> www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.**html<http://www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html>
>
--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
Tel. +81-45-314-9324
jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wordworks.jp/
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Richard Henninge
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Kahn, Rupert
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky