[lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te
- From: Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 18:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Even a great philosopher can hit below the belt at times :)
________________________________
From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:01 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te
> But that first thought opened the way to another, perhaps more
> interesting thought. What, philosophically speaking, counts as a mistake?
I hadn't realized you were a Platonist, John.
RP
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Adriano Palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te - Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Omar Kusturica
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Richard Henninge
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Kahn, Rupert
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: view of names, or in ginocchio da te- Walter C. Okshevsky