One can make the same sort argument about the Buddha's teachings being ``scientific,'' perhaps even with a bit more reason, since the central theme of those teachings is that nothing has an independent existence, that everything is interdependent, and that everything is constantly changing in accordance with its causes and conditions. These teachings are much less likely to come into conflict with science than are the dogmas and doctrines of Christianity, including the existence of a totally ``other'' creator. And then there is the passage in the Lankavatara Sutra that says: ``Things are not as they seem, nor are they otherwise,'' which seems to describe the ultimate teaching of quantum mechanics. And the instruction of the Buddha to rely on yourself sounds like a claim that one should adopt something like an empiricist approach to understanding that sounds remarkably ``scientific.'' On the other hand the Buddhist teachings are more properly considered as involving psychology than physics. And their goal is to allow us to free ourselves from the causes of our unhappiness, not to explain the world. The goal is not to understand the world, but to change ourselves, which is to be done by understanding ourselves. -- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH EMAIL: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu NOTE: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx no longer exists ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html