Green implicatures sleep conceptually. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > since the dude insists in thsi fictional "grice", why is it that > > > 'x is a good rally driver" implicates that x is not a a good driver? > compare and contrast.. implicatures if they exist at all are governed by > rules, where is the rule from good F x to not not good F [v\x]? > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:22 PM, dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In a message dated 3/17/2015 4:04:17 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx writes: >> "Law is just" is not a tautology, since laws can be unjust. to >> characterise Hart as a legal philosopher >> IMPLICATES he's not a good legal philosopher). >> >