zizek a political opposition party (with less success that Badiou...) On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There was hardly any political repression - in the form of political > arrests, censorship and other stuff that would normally be meant by that > term - going on in Yugoslavia from approximately the student protests in > 1968., which managed to induce the regime to adopt a more tolerant policy. > Žižek was born in 1947., so he would have been too young to fight > repression much earlier than that. It is possible that he participated in > the student protests in 1968. Tito eventually said that 'the students were > right' and many of those who participated in the student protests went on > to become members of the Communist Party. Žižek himself became a respected > academic under the Communist regime. > > O.K. > > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> What was the political repression against which Zizek fought, and in >> which country ? I don't think that there were any particular political >> restrictions in the former Yugoslavia in the 1980s in place to repress >> post-structuralist academic philosophy. Foucault was translated and >> published, for example. Moreover, Zizek was supposedly a Communist, or at >> least a Marxist. >> >> O.K. >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:16 PM, palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> alas not the delicate persiflage of Barthes, but Zizek. >>> a minor clown who got late into the scene for the political repression >>> in his country, against which he valiantly fought. then subsumed, Marx >>> would say by the bullshit of media, lacan, robespierre "light", etc. >>> a colossal waste of clean sheet >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, <cblists@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 03 Jul 2014, at 22:43, Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> > ... >>>> > A colleague suggested that I am not 'doing' philosophy properly, >>>> > drawing on the following as a guide for how it's done. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> http://www.openculture.com/2013/04/a_shirtless_slavoj_zizek_explains_the_purpose_of_philosophy_from_the_comfort_of_his_bed.html >>>> >>>> I don't know what to think about Žižek (which is perhaps a polite way >>>> of avoiding saying something negative). I like the epithet "clown prince of >>>> academic superstardom" (and think that perhaps he does, too). >>>> >>>> About Žižek's “Philosophy does not solve problems ... The duty of >>>> philosophy is not to solve problems, but to redefine problems, to show how >>>> what we experience as a problem is a false problem. If what we experience >>>> as a problem is a true problem, then you don’t need philosophy ... [just] >>>> good science.” >>>> >>>> My response is to remind Žižek - and others - is the reminder that what >>>> we now call 'science' was once known as 'natural philosophy', and is 'good' >>>> only when those 'roots' - or 'foundations' - are clearly acknowledged and >>>> (to stretch the metaphors) regularly examined for 'disease' and 'structural >>>> defects'. >>>> >>>> Chris Bruce, in >>>> Kiel, Germany >>>> -- >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, >>>> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> palma, e TheKwini, KZN >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> palma >>> >>> cell phone is 0762362391 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *only when in Europe*: >>> >>> inst. J. Nicod >>> >>> 29 rue d'Ulm >>> >>> f-75005 paris france >>> >>> >>> >> > -- palma, e TheKwini, KZN palma cell phone is 0762362391 *only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod 29 rue d'Ulm f-75005 paris france