Torgeir,
Do you seriously think that to call a group on Facebook Literature and
Ideas I would need a permission from someone ?
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:53 PM Torgeir Fjeld <t.fjeld1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Professor Adriano Palma,
For second language users of English, who might not be entirely updated on
the most recent developments of the language, here is a relevant definition
from a reliable online source:
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/frenemy
The other question you raise relates to the following issue, as per
commentary from a lay audience:
What does “feigned ignorance” mean in this context?
“Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart … increase the voluntary
character of sin.” (from the Catechism, paragraph 1859)
"Feigning ignorance would be like if I did something wrong, full well
knowing that it was wrong, and then made it out to seem like I didn’t know
that it was wrong to start with as though whatever I did was an accident."
passus, Aug '09
From https://forums.catholic.com/t/what-does-feigned-ignorance-mean/166384
Mvh. / Yours sincerely,
Torgeir Fjeld
https://torgeirfjeld.com/
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 13:45, Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
frenemy? phrenologist? enemy of the fruit?
what?
------------------------------
*From:* lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Torgeir Fjeld <t.fjeld1@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:51 PM
*To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [lit-ideas] Re: On the road
Dear Prof Palma and all,
When we are unsettled by some knowledge or presence we can wittingly or
unwittingly violate social norms. In so far as we cross the boundary of
acceptable conduct knowingly we are purposefully putting ourselves in a
position where we may reasonably expect social repercussions. In the case
of violations made in ignorance we enter the domain of the Freudian
unconscious. To Sigmund Freud what we refer to as reason by inference
served merely as a thin veneer of rationality, covering over hidden
desires, urges, memories, inhibitions, etc. In terms cherished by your
frenemy, thinking is something we undertake at our peril: we are most
ourselves when we do not think (to think).
Mvh. / Yours sincerely,
Torgeir Fjeld
https://torgeirfjeld.com/
Download the Introduction to my latest book -- rock philosophy:
meditations on art and desire -- for free from https://bit.ly/2vMGwVs.
Get a 24% discount by using code CFC159723D56 on checkout at the
publisher *https://vernonpress.com/book/494.
<https://vernonpress.com/book/494>* It is also available from Amazon:
*https://www.amazon.com/Rock-Philosophy-Meditations-Art-Desire/dp/1622734416/
<https://www.amazon.com/Rock-Philosophy-Meditations-Art-Desire/dp/1622734416/>
*
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 17:31, adriano paolo shaul gershom palma <
palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it is often call seeing, as opposed to being in the dark
after the cretin of the Black Forest the academicians invent all sort of
jargon, not being able to think, which is
an inferential task, no more and no less