the argument of speranza
uknown to vasta strata of populations.ùit aims at pointing out without any
inference
implication, implicature, and,or consequence that x was said by y, and that
x was not considered by grice, who may or may not be equivalent to the
historical >HP Grice who has a very low level of philosophy of science and
a scarce understanding of what a semantics looks like, though he saw well
the existence of pragmatic component in what peopleclaim to say or think
know the meaning of.ùthe argument ad speranza quite interestinglty has no
conclusion.
Nothing is said and baptized conceptual analysis
