Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 12:21:45 AM, Eric Yost wrote: EY> Judy wrote: you seem to be the world authority on unnamed persons! EY> There are undoubtedly billions of silent or unnamed people who know more EY> than I do about unnamed narrators. They have probably been busy with EY> other things today. probably gathering unnamed narrators (or other unnamed characters)... EY> It is worth bringing up (what Henry James referred to as) "central EY> intelligence," where the narrator is omniscient with respect to the EY> overall external fictional situation, but is internally omniscient with EY> respect to the consciousness of one particular character. EY> This is almost like having an unnamed narrator, in that the central EY> intelligence of the novel is directly related to character X but not the EY> same as X, and so could be X's identical twin narrating from the EY> distance of years. EY> Someone who knows all the external events of a fiction and also the EY> intimate thoughts of one character is almost like a character, a EY> busybody friend of the family. EY> So maybe all novels that use this narrative technique could be EY> considered to employ an unnamed central character as narrator? I'm not sure -- interesting -- -- mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html