Sorry, I was in a slightly bad mood. The post office and Royal Mail thing here is slightly complicated but the last time I heard, the situation was that anyone could deliver letters (as of 2001; previously, only the Post Office Group could deliver letters weighing less than 350grammes/costing less than Â1 to post), but only the Post Office Group (Royal Mail) was prepared to do that given the conditions attached by the govt, i.e., all households must be given the same service at the same price. Blair usually handles little obstacles like that by paying private companies to take something on (notably British Rail; but also private medical clinics are paid for operations, at a higher cost than the NHS, whether they actually do them or not); currently he's "only" cutting post offices. And yes, given the role post offices have played here, 4 miles is too far away. Judy ----- Original Message ----- From: "John McCreery" <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 10:07 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-ideas] Let's talk about beauty â > Judy wrote, > > > > > typical; I wonder whether that will happen in the postal service > > here; people are fighting to keep post offices open > > > > What do we know about the history of privatization in the UK and > Germany? I ask because, on one hypothesis, what you are encountering > is the muddle that naturally follows when a former monopoly suddenly > faces competition. Over time things may straighten out. > > The hypothesis seems plausible to me because, during recent trips to > the U.S. I have noticed that the U.S. Postal service has improved > dramatically from this customer's perspective. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html