On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > There may be something conceptually odd about it but there's also something > unsatisfying about a merely schematic account of what might be going on > here; schematic insofar as neither a context for or examples of one's saying > 'I no longer believe what I thought I believed,' are given. (One small > point: one may no longer believe P—which one formerly thought one > believed—without believing not-P; one may say—and this seems to me a fairly > common experience—that one thought one believed P, but now one doesn't know > what to believe, or what one believes.) Could we conclude that, confronted with the question, "Do you believe in God?" Walter's philosopher sees only two alternatives: faith or atheism. He does not consider either remaining agnostic or "Not in your God" as possible answers? John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 http://www.wordworks.jp/