[lit-ideas] Re: lit-ideas Crime Rate Factors

  • From: eternitytime1@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:48:04 -0500

Hi,
Here is an intriguing look at "Reasons Advanced for the Recent Decrease in the 
Crime Rate, with Commentary and Conclusions".? It's pretty extensive--the FBI 
has, actually a list of 13 factors that affect crime. This report finds support 
(or in a couple of cases opposition) for nine of them--and then another two 
factors that are not listed in the FBI's list. There are citations of studies 
for each of the factors - summarized well, though the author mentions that 
"Despite the strident support given to individual factors, none was shown, 
unequivocally, to fully explain the recent decline in the crime rate."? It goes 
on to mention that it is possible that some factors were influential in a 
limited number of situations and some were influential across a wide variety of 
situations. 

http://caag.state.ca.us/cjsc/publications/misc/why/3sec3.pdf

When I met yesterday evening with a police officer at the conclusion of the 
main reason we met, I asked about a little of this. ?(I'm doing some research 
for one of them in our area--nice to know that we have this sort of police type 
in our area--they actually want research and evidence on things...)? 
He basically began mentioning the same factors as in this report (and the FBI 
factors) and analyzed them. (this was before I mentioned this report)? 

I found the report fascinating because much of my regular work world touches on 
involvement in these factos and one of the things that has happened, 
increasingly, is the interaction of law enforcement (and the US Justice Dept) 
in much of the community-oriented, restorative justice movement--and this 
report definitely shows how these arenas are doing their research and being so 
innovative as they implement it. (As a librarian, <g>, anyone who does 
continuing research in theri profession is rare and to be valued...) 

When I asked, specifically, what he thought about NYC, he paused. He 
overall?opinion was that what Giuliani may have done was to provide the freedom 
and the support for the police and community agencies to do their work.?

 Taking a page from LH and JL, I'll try to mention a few that interest me in 
terms of this conversation, but if one really wants to see the breadth of the 
'why' and then compare to see if Giuliani may or may not have been The One who 
was the one who was addressing the crime rate (for, as Andreas says, the crime 
rates were going down--and I credit this to the law enforcement and community 
agency fields, myself--but positions such as mayors, city councils?and city 
managers -- along with federal and state governments who may provide block 
grants for particular specialized units to be able to function also have a huge 
impact.

1.?One of the first factors is Effect Strength of Law-enforcement agencies and 
looks directly at NYC. 

Anderson (1997) cited the decrease in crime in NYC as evidence that increased 
community policing has contributed to the decreasing crime rate. Police 
Commissioner William Bratton ordered a citywide campaign against minor 
offenses, such as drinking in public. He ordered police to erquest 
identification from anyone suspected of committing an infraction, taking into 
custody anyone without acceptable identification. The homicide rate immediately 
began declining steeply, with the largest decrease in homicides committed with 
guns and out-of-doors. Homicides decreased as both patrol strength and 
misdemeanor arrests for quality-of-life offenses increased. These measures have 
also been successful in Boston, Houston, Dallas and San Diego.

This next piece might be way the NRA was a bit leary of endorsing Giuliani <g>.

Blumstein and Rosenfeld (1998) wrote that police programs to remove guns from 
kids have had some positive effect. These programs include "stop and Frisk" 
detentions in NYC, bounty for reports of illegal guns leading to confiscation 
in Charleston, SC and "voluntary" searches of homes with suspected illegal 
weapons leading to confiscation without criminal charges in St. Louis. Carrying 
weapons decreased wihich reduced concern for self-protection. This led to a 
declining spiral in carrying and using guns. A decreased homicide rate 
followed. Police enforcement of gun confiscation policies along with 
community-based policing appear to have contributed to the recent decrease in 
the homicide rate in specific localities. 

NOTE FROM MB:? This next piece was very much what my police officer was talking 
about -- and apparently in our area, there was also a shift...? The above has 
been explained ALOT in discussion as to why so many police officers do go sit 
out on the road and look for traffic offenders. Not listed in this study, but 
quoted in others is the fact that offenders are often 'caught' while doing 
minor things 'wrong'--like speeding or driving with expired license plates. 
[this is often explained by police who are? stating to the press that they will 
be doing 'checks' on certain days--they actually let people know in advance 
here and which roads--and it is NOT because they need to 'make a quota' as so 
many here say, but because they have seen more hard criminals caught...] 

Kelling and Bratton (1998) related an "insiders" view of the decrease in crime 
in New York City. Kelling was one of the architects of the policy taht New York 
City adopted and Bratton was the Chief of Police who made the policy a reality. 
The policy had its orgin in a magazine artcle by Wilson and Kelling (1992) 
which stated that police had shifted their focus from maintaining order in 
neighborhoods to solving crime. At the community level, disorder and crime are 
tightly linked. They literally found taht if a window in a building is broken 
and left unrepaired, it won't be long before other windows are broken. Theis 
will happen in all neighborhoods, but not because of an innate desire of 
residents to break windows. It will happen because one unerqpired window is a 
sign that no one cares and that breaking windows has no consequence, and, after 
all, it is fun. The authors felt that the link between "order-maintenace" and 
"crime-prevention" should be erestablished by police who s
 hould return to the view that they ought to protect communities as well as 
individuals. After this link was resotred, the spiraling crime rate was brought 
under control.

(there is also a quote relating to this of study by a psychologist who did a 
study of having a car paked with no license plates and its hood up in the Bronx 
and another in Palo Alto, CA. The stripping of the car in the Bronx began 
within 10 minutes. (Most of the "vandals" were well-dresssed, seemingly 
clearn-cut)? The Palo Alto car was untouched for a week, and he partly smashed 
it. Within a few hours, the car had been turned over and destroyed. Again--and 
more studies on this are quoted-there is a link between "untended" behavior 
that leads to the breakdown of community controls, etc. 

Community Policiing--actually the city that has done a great job (in this 
report) is Boston. Their campaign was a cooperation between police and citizens 
to scrub off graffiti, run youth clubs, provide tutoring and counseling and 
look out for truants. A dramatic decrease in juvenile murders followed.

Factor 2: Administrative and investigative emphases of law enforcement--This 
was intriguing as I had not thought of the rise of 'color-coded' maps (and now 
GPS info) 
Factor 3:? Policies of other components of the criminal justice system (ie 
proecutorial, judicial, correctonal and probational)? ?This one had a lot of 
commentary--some about NYC. (also in my area-the rise of Youth Courts, for 
example, is in this arena and at least in MY geographical area, the research 
shows its effectiveness in reigning in minor crime youth offendors as a part of 
the restorative justice movement)

In NYC, mention of the shift to earlier intervention by lower courts as a 
front-end, proactive approach to prevent crime wtih more meaningful sanctions 
and treatment requirements after the first or second minor offense. (here the 
$$ to do so was mentioned and how NYC set up a community court to arraign 
low-level offenders, sentence them to community service and refer them to a 
well-staffed social service office)?? Did Giuliani provide the funding for 
this?? I would be interested to know. (How would the Republicans view this 
concept, I wonder? More $$ for social services? Or was there a different 
spin??I do know the US Justice Dept had to fight very very hard in the current 
administration's budget to keep the DARE program from being eliminated though 
it is effective in areas and very effective where police depts get a good 
School Resource Officer in place who can relate to the kids--it was those in 
this area who set up the Youth Court program...)

As well--there seems to be a bit of evidence for the RICO Act which has had an 
impact in NYC for reduction of violent crime.

MY WORK
The next piece actually related to conversation on one of my 
library-professional lists. This was the discussion on keeping gangs from 
congregating via public nuisance laws and how this had quite an impact on the 
reduction of crime.

The work-related aspect is that a few libraries have 'banned' the use of 
MySpace and FaceBook from being accessed from the public library computers 
because of the problems of gangs using them to 'meet'.? 

(My police guy and I talked about this--for he had mentioned this [on his own] 
and it led to discussion on how all ties together...)? 

4. Citizens' attidutes toward crime (here are cites towards community 
anti-crime organizations, in Brooklyn, fundamental shifts in youth culture to 
withdraw from the dangers of the drug culture to the safety of family, home, 
church and other institutions. "Some youths formed into two large gangs whose 
purpose in the largely Puerto Rican area was to 'uplift the Latino community'"? 
(this also concurs with the studies done in Youth Cultural Competence which I 
have had to examine for my work-world--the Urban Library Council has some. Can 
provide stats on this, if anyone is interested.)
Other factors (commentary is in the article)

5. Population density and degree of urbanization
6. Variations in composition of the population, particularly youth 
concentration 
7. Economic conditions, including median income, pvoerty level and job 
availability (this has LOTS of citations--let's keep the economy as robust as 
possible--)
8. Cultural factors and educational, recreational, and religious 
characteristics (this one had the most mixy of postive/negative citations for 
the conclusion of this being meaningful towards a decrease in crime)
9. Family conditions with erspect to divorce and family cohesiveness (this was 
interesting-the idea was that as alternative family structures have become more 
common, their effectiveness in preventing crime and deviance has 
increased--though discussion as to the increase in reliance on the educational 
system for expansion to provide support for the family, no matter its 
makeup,?has also contributed...)
10. Drug use (here discussion as to the history of the rise of crack cocaine in 
the mid-80s led to unstable-street-corner markets for a drug with a 10-minute 
'high' which made it necessary for users to get money quickly and 
repeatedly--and increase in gangs bec of it. Lots of cites here. As well as 
studies to show that alcohol use is decreasing among non-whites and youth and 
has contributed, esp, to lower youth homicide rates)
11. Weapons

Anyway, this me channelling JL for the day...and wondering if anyone will look 
up the study or was interested!

Best,
Marlena in Missouri
thinking about gangs using MySpace to plan crimes and if Guiliani will 'ban' it 
if he is really going to be tough on crime <g>
-----Original Message-----------------------------------
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:13:13 -0500
From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Anscombe Society threats

 >>So why did Paris change? How did Giuliani change that? Didn't crime=20
in the entire USA decrease in the same period? Did Giuliani change that 
too?

John repaired his watch. So how did those other watches get repaired?=20
Did John repair those watches?

?>>Whatever happened in NYC would have happened anyway, with or without=20
Giuliani.

Because other people repaired their watches, John's watch would have=20
been repaired even if John did not repair it.

http://www.answers.com/topic/new-york-city-of-southern-new-york?cat=3Dtra=
vel

.. the attendant crime that affects New Yorkers and visitors alike has
seen a continued dramatic reduction from 1993 to 2004=97NYC has a murder 
rate half that of cities such as Los Angeles and Chicago, in part as the 
result of a concerted effort by local agencies.


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

Other related posts: