> Yeah, that's where I got the book. The internet research has become a book. It's odd that the conservative bloggers were able to bring doubt on Dan Rather and the National Guard documents, but in the end, that's all there was: doubt. But in the case of Bush, there's massive amounts of irrefutable evidence on 9.11, Iraq, oil, the environment, and many other disasters, yet he continues to gain in the polls. Many people simply don't care about the facts, no matter how damning. In that matter, the web hasn't been successful as an information resource. Maybe it's like the Savings and Loan scandals under Reagan; the story was too big, too complex. Bush supporters have generally a poor education; they can understand stories about kittens in trees and so on, but massive corporate fraud? It's too much. yrs, andreas www.andreas.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html