[lit-ideas] Re: disimplications of "know" [a correction]
- From: "Richard Henninge" <RichardHenninge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:44:44 +0100
Defeasing disimplications of "know" [(a correction of) a correction]
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Paul
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:13 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: disimplications of "know" [a correction]
I could make [a] living out of sending corrections to my own posts. Here's
the latest—an important one for it negates the one it corrects.
*This is a strange conclusion. Some days ago, Donal posted links to the
famous/infamous paper in which Edmund Gettier provided several examples of a
person's having a justified true belief that most people would NOT count as
cases of his knowing P, cases in which we WOULD [ not "would not"] say (most of
us) that even though a person had a true, justified belief that P, she did not
know it.
Robert Paul
At least you didn't end with "or not."
Richard Henninge
University of Mainz
Other related posts:
