Is this a poem, Lawrence ? Certainly it doesn't look like reasoned argument. A lot of people thought prior to the war that Saddam would probably have some WMDs somewhere, but not a lot of people thought that he had them in large quantities or of a high quality which would justify presenting him as a serious threat. This was something that was beefed up by the intelligence reports and political speeches. Bush made specific claims about the kinds and quantities of the WMDs Saddam was supposed to have prior to the war (the State of the Union speech) and we now know that these claims were not supported by evidence. There were also the IAEA reports which suggested that Saddam might not have any WMDs at all and these claims were ignored. Personally, I thought that the Democrats, i.e. the leadership of the Democrat Party, need to defend the charges of supporting the war or not opposing it strenuously when such opposition was badly needed. O.K. I suppose it makes Leftists feel good To lyingly cry "lie," but 'tis a lie anyone Who has kept up with Knows and decries. Not being anti-intellectual, I read about Saddam and his Iraq. All our Iraqi assets were over here Or a long way from knowing Anything worthwhile. Even His generals thought he had WMDs; So lie me no more lies Lest thee be seen for a Lying Leftist - unless 'tis a thing thou Wishest in which case carry on - I suppose - our being unlike The tyranny we deposed. But Not being willing to pass on actions The way we do such words As "lie," we lie here listening For the tick of a nuclear disaster Coming soon in theaters near you. Lawrence ____________________________________________________________________________________ Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html