I will be happy to oblige in your distinctions if they are true, but they are not. Saddam Hussein had a history of supporting terrorism and therefore militant Islam though you persist in saying this isn't so. (I believe you have also propagated the notion that Saddam was secular but haven't explained why he went to the gallows with a Qur'an - asking that it be given to his friend after his death - and intoning the shahadah.) Here is a slew of links about Saddam's links to al Qaeda and terrorism:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts ~Brian On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:57 AM, JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote:
What I really mean is, evil and sadistic and vile as Hussein was, he neither represented, assisted, nor sponsored Militant Islam. Could we please try to keep that fundamental difference straight if we're to discuss any of the incredible ME confusion with any clarity at all?
