I don't think it's that complicated. In a sentence (and more to follow): economists are finding out (again) that unrestrained capitalism does not produce unending growth but rather a cyclical pattern of peaks and troughs. It's as though the demise of the Soviet Union and the gradual lure of capitalism in China had convinced those in the know that capitalism had no down side and was an unrivalled panacea. But what actually happened was that decision makers let the system go, decreasing regulations, increasing rewards to profit regardless of risk, and thereby exposing the global economy to the worst recession since the last depression. Globalism doesn't just provide benefits to the world, it also ensures the downside is widespread. Now watch capital draw its arms in protectively, take a snooze or maybe hibernate while labour is shown the gates - an invitation to the food scrabble. Blame Fukuyuma, but not Lawrence. Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: Julie Krueger To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:20 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Worried? I wonder if an element of this (not the whole story, but a contributing impact) is: Capitalism seems to work for a while under certain circumstances. And though there was certainly a good deal of import & export, trade, tariff issues, etc. in the past, only recently have we gone from having a national economy to having an economy which is, thanks to globalization and a true global economy, more a part of that global economy than simply a national economy. Our economy is far less self-contained than what it has been in previous crises. Capitalism may not work nearly as well as part of a global economy that also includes other various and far different economic models. The complexity of the global economic issues seem to me to make the uphill battle for a stable American capitalism far steeper. Julie Krueger