Back in the day, I used the expression "metaphysics of experience" to describe what W was getting at when saying "Death is not an event in life" etc. (Or so I recall; only the owlish, as Root noted, have time or need to check past posts unless someone else points out they are misquoting). There were murmurs of dissent. A pall of disquiet spread like petrol on a forecourt of alarm. Well, lookee here: http://www.amazon.com/Insight-Illusion-Wittgenstein-Philosophy-Metaphysics/dp/0195198239/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257768157&sr=1-2 with W on the very same in the subtitle. Though Dr.Hacker of St.John's may have moved on from this position (how far I cannot say) he may be counted as a fellow-traveller given the use of the expression "metaphysics of experience"; though a perusal of his tome fails to disclose whether he would use the expression apropos the "Death is not an event.." insight (or apercu, as I put it), while that perusal yet having an immediate and alarming but hopefully transitory impact on my prose-style, he does seem to take the "metaphysics of experience" as central to W's work generally, albeit to be approached by considerations drawn from the philosophy of language so-called. Donal ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html