[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete's Role Reversal

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:39:35 -0800

From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Andy Amago wrote:

"Okay, so now we know what his intention wasn't.  But what was his

Phil replies:

For the sake of this thread, it is immaterial.

No, it's not immaterial. It's totally on point. It was YOU who made it the point:

Quote from Phil:

Codswallop.  The difference in intentionality regarding the deaths of
civilians is a qualitative one and to ignore it speaks volumes.

You said that intention was all the difference. It speaks volumes.

Well, so far, it's spoken zero.


To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: