O. K. is right that the author of "Why Is Academic Writing So Academic?" is expecting a tautologous reply. "It wouldn't be academic if it were not academic". McEvoy should object at this point that we are mitigating the force of 'so'. The question is: "Why Is Academic Writing SO [emphasis mine. Speranza] Academic?" and not the trivial "Why Is Academic Writing Academic?" And the logical form of 'so' is _so_ complex, to echo Witters. ---- In a message dated 2/25/2014 8:43:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx writes: In a message dated 2/25/2014 5:48:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, pastone@xxxxxxxxx writes: "diety"? Laughing...I would think it was a typo, but with mike, one never can tell. He is quoting from Geary: On Feb 25, 2014 5:29 PM, "Mike Geary" <gearyservice@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >what kind of diety would create a Life Form that depends for its life on eating other Life Forms? ---- As Geary notes, the _essence_ of academic writing (and also reading, if I may otiosely add -- since, as Emily Dickinson once wrote (and read), "Why am I writing all this stuff if I shall be the only one to read it?") is _theological_: deity (n.) Look up deity at Dictionary.comc.1300, "divine nature;" late 14c., "a god," from Old French deité, from Late Latin deitatem (nominative deitas) "divine nature," coined by Augustine from Latin deus "god," from PIE *deiwos (see Zeus). Agustine thought that 'deus' was not enough. He needed a 'deitas'. Or not. "Deus" was possibly being abused by Augustine's time, hence the need to coin 'deity' (deitas). Deus shares the root with Sanscr.: dī, div- (dyu-), to gleam: dyāus (Gr. ζεύς), heaven: dévas, God; cf. Gr. διος, εὐδία; but not θεός, Curt. Gr. etym. 503 sqq.. a god, a deity (for syn. cf.: divus, numen). And so on. Cheers, Speranza ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html