I only have one place where copyright laws really annoy me. I, too, play the piano (and violin), and there are times when I want to practice a long piece of music (a Mozart Sonata, e.g.), without a page turn, before I have opportunity to commit it to memory. The local xerox places will not copy so much as one page out of a book copyrighted as far back as ... well....forever.... for me. Illogically, but fortunately for me (I can't afford 3 books of Mozart Sonatas when I paid a fair amount of money for the one I own), they'll provide a xerox machine for me and allow me to copy that page myself. <insert multiple epithets here> Julie Krueger On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Veronica Caley <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ** > I was not thinking about piracy. I was thinking of someone lending their > Kindle or such to a relative. Not copying, which is theft. Re reading > aloud, I was not thinking of "performing." My husband and I sometimes will > read a paragraph to each other. Everyone is not a thief. > > I lately heard that people steal like crazy at self check outs. This > never occurred to me and I wouldn't do it. But I have no sympathy for > stores which Aare trying to automate everyone out of a job. > > Re music,, I play the piano and pay for the music books I use. Even for > Bach. > > Veronica Caley > > Milford,, MI > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Thomas Hart <tehart@xxxxxxx> > *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2012 4:04 PM > *Subject:* [lit-ideas] Re: What's THIS ?!? > > Actually, it's not silly. > > An electronic file can be reproduced endlessly with the click of a button. > If you can obtain a work for little or no cost, you're not going to buy it. > That's why there are so many illegal copies of overpriced programs like > Autocad in engineering offices. They buy one copy at $4,000, and then it's > passed around throughout the organization. Autodesk, the manufacturer of > Autocad may well jack the price up to compensate for the pirated copies. > > Once the file is lent, it can be copied and archived. You can go to a > library, check out a CD, DVD, or Blu-Ray, and then copy it to your > computer. The library effectively becomes an accomplice in piracy. The same > goes for books. BODT (Books On Dead Trees) can be scanned, turned into PDF > files, or text files, and then passed around endlessly. There are sites > where you can download dozens of books that are not in the public domain, > not released for free distribution. The available titles range from John > Grisham and Tom Clancy novels to titles from O'Reilly, Cambridge University > Press, and Oxford University press, and these are all available illegally > and free. > > Now I personally think that the copyright law needs revision so that works > from the 1930s, 1940s, and maybe even the 1960s and 1970s are freely > available, but the law as it stands says that many works that you can find > freely available on the net are there illegally. > > As to the reading aloud, that probably comes under the category of > performance. All of Bach is in the public domain, but when you perform and > record an harpsichord concerto, that performance is copyrightable, and > cannot be used in a public forum without paying a fee. So you can read > sonnets to your sweetie in private, but don't do it at your local tavern. > It may also mean that you can't use any text to speech functions. > > "All women are created equal. > Then some become Marines" > > Katy Perry video for "Part of me" > > Thomas Hart > tehart@xxxxxxx > > > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Veronica Caley wrote: > > Lending not allowed > Reading aloud not allowed > > Shows the silliness of too many rules, laws, regulations that are > inherently unenforceable.. > > Veronica Caley > Milford, MI > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: <cblists@xxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:19 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] What's THIS ?!? > > > I don't have, but - until I read the following - had been considering > purchasing, an electronic book 'reader'. > > > In searching the Internet for William Gaddis' AGAPE, AGAPE, I noticed the > following 'additional details' appended to the listing for the Adobe > eBooks edition: > > > Adobe PDF eBook Rights > > Copying not allowed > > Printing not allowed > > Lending not allowed > > Reading aloud not allowed > > > The first two or three seem straightforward enough (the lending > restriction seems a bit severe; it's hard to imagine not lending out a > book). > > > BUT can it possibly be true that, should I purchase an eBook copy of this > (or any other book with similar 'rights' attached), I would be agreeing > (in a legally binding way) that I would not read the book aloud to a > friend / loved one / family member? > > > Do people actually, by buying such eBooks, agree to such a restriction in > (what to me is an essential component in) the life of a piece of literature? > > > Chris Bruce, > > more thankful than ever for his > > 'outsider borrowing privileges' > > at the local university library, in > > Kiel, Germany > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > >