Lawrence,
As you suggest, let's keep this scientific and avoid the ad hominem
argument that those interested in genetics as a possible explanation of
human behavior are espousing inherently racist views. I haven't followed
the discussion closely enough to be sure that what I write below is
relevant. Please correct me where my third-hand views of second-hand
discussion of primary sources I have never read goes astray.
Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that we have on the table the
proposition that changes in genes explain the shift from hunting and
gathering to agriculture.
Do we have any evidence of any form that demonstrates the presence of these
genetic changes prior to the appearance of agriculture or coinciding with
it?
If we see morphological evidence of, for example, predictable changes in
the skeletons of those who practice agriculture versus those who practice
hunting and gathering, how do we determine that these are the results of
changes in genotype and not changes due to behavioral changes required by
agriculture, e.g., bending over to hoe and weed?
How do we address the effects of population mobility and the mixing
resulting from what my first Anthropology teacher called the only natural
law that anthropologists have ever discovered: When peoples meet, they mate?
And then, of course, we come to the question of genetic mechanisms. Here we
have to address recent advances in hard core biochemically based studies
of genetic processes that indicate that the same genotypes can have
radically different effects depending on the specific proteins with which
they interact.. . . .Obvious enough when one considers that the same
embryonic stem cells can become specialized bone, heart or liver cells, but
sorting out how that happens turns out to be a wicked problem.
Cheers,
John
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 11:05 AM, John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Larry Kramer. Yes.
John
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Ursula Stange <ursula@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Larry Kramer?
On Jul 8, 2016, at 8:50 PM, Mike Geary <jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On the old Philosophy and Literature list there were two politically
conservative posters named Lawrence, (1) you - Lawrence Helm and another
Lawrence whose last name escapes me now. I used to refer to the two of you
as "the two Larrys." Does anyone remember the other Larry's name? As I
recall, there were several politically conservative leaning members on that
list. Perhaps there are several here as well but who find this list not the
proper podium to practice their art. This list is certainly a lot less
politically oriented. Liberal-Conservative stances show themselves far
more readily in political conversations and those are few and far between
now. I hail from a very liberal,Irish-Catholic, Southern white,
working-class, maternally-ruled, (my mother could have taught Betty Friedan
some lessons), Civil-Rights-marching family of five boys and one girl. --
and a very hard working, calm and amused father. At dinner Mom would read
a paragraph or two from some liberal political magazine such as Ramparts
and we would all be expected to discuss it. It was argument among the like
minded -- but I would often play the Devil's Advocate just for fun. I miss
growing up.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Lawrence Helm <
lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I should have included a disclaimer but I didn't know quite how to
phrase it. I still don't but I'll try anyway. For many years I have read
or acquired to read everything I could find on genetics as it affects human
and canine evolution. The magnitude of my effort strikes me as very small,
but I have erred in the past when estimating the worth of various efforts.
OTOH while I have been receiving three news feeds on scientific advances
for quite a long time, I have not been keeping up very well with them. So,
while I am very aware that the study of genomes, genes, alleles, etc. for
the purpose of determining what everything does is relatively new, the
nature of natural selection and the recent discoveries have triggered
speculations not just with Wade. In fact I had already thought of a
significant percentage of what Wade writes in his book. He is much more
thorough than I could have been and of course he has access to materials I
couldn't have or could have but wasn't aware of. Still, as has been
demonstrated fairly often (without a clear explanation of why it happens, a
"climate of opinion" sometimes exists. Had Darwin for example not produced
his theory of evolution Alfred Russell Wallace would have.
I am not claiming anything more than a certain degree of attentiveness
which has caused me to have many of "the thoughts floating around out
there" that anyone (or many ones) interested in these aspects of genetics
will have.
I have no reason not to embrace whatever new discoveries are made in
these fields of genetics. I also confess to not being aware (until reading
Wade's book) that there was resistance to the possibility of racial genetic
differences because of 1) they might inspire new bouts of racism, 2) they
run counter to Marxist theory, and 3) they run counter to Leftist ideas.
The other day I ran across an old Lit-Ideas' comment of Geary's in which
he is answering the question of someone who hadn't been on Lit-Ideas for a
long time and was wondering "where everyone was." He identified me as the
only true "conservative" still on Lit Ideas. I frankly don't think of
myself that way any longer. I have "given up politics" for the duration.
I don't plan on getting into any of the political arguments I did in the
past -- and yet here we are in a new arena. Something that strikes me as
purely scientific, that is, looking at evidence from science, history,
anthropology etc and then speculating or reasoning from it strikes me as
non-political. I'm not saying that this reasoning somehow turns into
evidence or proof. At best it becomes a plausibility to be set alongside
other plausabilities and I don't see any thing in that to be afraid of.
Perhaps other people do however, and I can respect that.
While I had already thought of or encountered elsewhere much of what
Wade wrote I felt a need to post a recognition of and perhaps speculate
about ideas I hadn't already encountered, but I needn't post them on
Lit-Ideas. I can post them on my blog and have that be the end of them. I
might be able to get back to poetry more quickly if I take that course.
Lawrence
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
Tel. +81-45-314-9324
jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wordworks.jp/
