On 2/27/07, Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why do you want to know things, in general? is a strange question. Why do you want to know how to change a light bulb, or what the conjugation of 'savoir' won't ordinarily be puzzling. Why do you want to know anything at all? seems hopeless.
It's a strange question, but not a bad one. I take on board Professor Paul's comment that the answer will often be specific. When knowledge has an instrumental value, failure to know may imply the inability to perform the task at hand. And Walter is right that, logically speaking, the answers suggested have nothing to do with the epistemic quality of knowledge. They may yet have some pedagogical value. How does one answer a student who asks, "Why do I have to know that?" Or a legislator or funding agency that asks, "Why should this be taught or researched?" If nothing else, an answer might be used in the way that Virginia Satir recommends using sensory modes in The Art of Verbal Self-Defense (for a brief description see http://adrr.com/aa/overview.html). It is easy to note, for example, on e-mail lists like this one the difference between people who are sharing delight in something they enjoy and those who use their "knowledge" as a weapon, in an effort to dominate the conversation. And, of course, it has been a central theme in late twentieth century critique of Enlightenment aspirations to universal and objective knowledge that these too often turn out to be masks for domination, the "facts" in question being all and only the ones that those in power allow to be considered. It is interesting that of the comments so far, Eric's is the one that takes the question most seriously. "I'm not sure about a "will" to know, but I think the desire to know has a strong erotic component. Else why would people write so much when they are in love? Eros is play as much as power isn't it?" Play or power? Is to frame the issue in this way a sign that we have finally sent the True and the Good to the same limbo where Beauty now resides? A space in the library reserved for dustry tomes about issues that are, as Willliam James put it, no longer alive for us? A space where collapse of consensus leaves once imposing topics batted around like shuttlecocks by those content to walk away at the end of the day saying only, "Well, that's just your opinion"? John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 http://www.wordworks.jp/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html