"Sets" was plainly the wrong word. "Thingies" perhaps?
Re "One might believe, with Frege, that a concept without sharp boundaries isn't a concept at all, and with a precocious Jamesian infant that the actual world will continue to be a vast, buzzing, blooming confusion. Words are words and not some other thing and the relation between word and world is something else entirely."
Yes, but then, like Frege, you would find yourself at the end of the day with nothing to talk about except mathematics. Can we name even one major topic of human discourse--love, law, art, religion, philosophy, science....whatever....for which a nonarbitrary concept is possible given Frege's strictures?
Note, please, that I have no problem with constructing definitions for hypothetical or practical purposes, only with those who think that scholastic logic-chopping is learning something about the Jamesian infant's world.
John
-- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
US CITIZEN ABROAD? YOU'RE THE DECIDER! Register to Vote in '06 Elections www.VoteFromAbroad.org ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html