McCreery: "One conclusion, however, is sure. Oxford dons poring over their local dialect of English and approaching their project in a spirit that requires the constant challenge of assumptions may produce all sorts of charming or interesting comments. Knowledge they cannot be." -- and then minutes ago, I've just posted a LOONG post on one Oxford don I like which thus McCreery, upon fear of gagging, will ignore. But I cannot see how you can be so sure about the conclusion. Do you _know_ it. Also, it's not clear what 'they' refers to in your final sentence in the passage above. Surely the charming don's 'assumption' is never _claimed_ to be 'knowledge'. Knowledge is demystified by the Oxford don. It's placed in perspective, within philosophy of perception, and so-called 'epistemology'. Is discussed by Englishmen vis a vis other Englishmen to rectify the Englishmen's conception on how to use 'know'. They will not accept 'prescriptions' -- and each don -- but not necessarily his tuttee -- will put forward his definition to _calm_ his Socratic zeal for "maieuticks", not because he has to please, God forbid, Popper or Feyerabend. Cheers, J. L. S. B. A., Argentina **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)