Simply put, I meant you attacked the person rather than the argument. Your criticism goes like this: Hewitt did not serve Hewitt wants others to serve Hewitt is a hypocrite for not serving but wanting others toThis is along the same lines that the pro-abortion crowd uses when saying that if you oppose abortion don't have one and also the position that if you are a man you have no right to speak about abortion. It is not a refutation of an argument but a personal attack.
Of course your whole post wasn't made up of this but I'm tired of the subject already.
~Brian On Dec 20, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Mike Geary wrote:
So, pray tell, what did you mean when you wrote: "Hewitt's position is no more negated by his lack of service than those that said to abolitionists 'don't like slavery? Don't own one.'" ?