Jack, A response is located at http://www.lawrencehelm.com/2011/09/was-housing-market-like-ponzi-scheme.html Lawrence From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jack Spratt Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:52 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Was the Housing market like a Ponzi scheme? The housing market was a bubble, not a Ponzi scheme. It's sloppy use of a word that seems to be entering into the vernacular and expanding its range. What Maddoff did was a Ponzi scheme, he kept recruiting new investors, pocketing the money and sending out bogus statements that sang of double digit returns. It was all phony. In the housing bubble people were buying houses and flipping them, i.e. selling them for more than they paid, as an investment to make money, because of Greenspan's idiotic interest rates. It's a Ponzi scheme to the extent that it was supposed to go on forever until it didn't. The problem isn't so much the flipping as that people were taking out mortgages that were over their heads and also using their houses as credit cards, borrowing against them for consumer items hoping to repay when they resold. When the bubble burst they were stuck with all the debt. However, the banks and hedge funds were the fuel behind the fire. They bundled the bad mortages and sold them to each other and made billions of dollars pushing them to consumers. Now they're happy to pass on the blame and are sitting pretty financially while people are hung out to dry. Social Security is much more a Ponzi scheme, and it's running out of workers. Where there were six workers to one retiree in the 60's, there are three workers for one retiree today. Bubbles are like a mass hysteria that sweeps periodically, the tulip mania, the Japanese real estate market, now the Chinese real market possibly. J.S.