I just finished Edmund Wilson's Axel's Castle, a Study of the Imaginative Literature of 1870-1930. Wilson is impressive. The Symbolists he discusses are Yeats, Valery, Eliot, Proust, Joyce and Stein. I wondered why he didn't mention Kafka. Surely something of Kafka's was available to Wilson by the time he wrote (1931), but perhaps not the novels. I remember that Kafka had difficulty finishing novels and Max Brod published many things after Kafka's death. Well all right, what was Wilson's opinion about Kafka later on? I checked Google and found the answer in a couple of places. The following is an NYROB article from 2005: <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17911> http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17911 The article is a debate between Crews and Corngold/Wagner. Corngold wrote a couple of books on Kafka and Crews reviewed them negatively. The debate isn't very edifying. Crews review is quibbled with by Corngold and Wagner. But the part I was looking for is as follows. Crews writes: "Regarding the value of Kafka's writings, I differ from Crews fundamentally, and I cannot guess what he means by comparing Kafka to Mel Brooks. Nor do I share his satisfaction with Edmund Wilson's view that it is impossible 'to take [Kafka] seriously as a major writer.'" In http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/vermeer/287/interpretations.htm is the Wilson quote But with much admiration for Kafka, I find it impossible to take him seriously as a major writer and have never ceased to be amazed at the number of people who can...To compare Kafka...with Joyce and Proust and even with Dante...is obviously quite absurd...putting K beside writers with whom he may properly be compared, he still seems rather unsatisfactory...I do not see how one can possibly take him for either a great artist or a moral guide. -Edmund Wilson, "A Dissenting Opinion on Kafka" I'm not sure I'm sufficiently interested to buy Kafka: A Collection of Critical Essays in order to read Wilson's essay. Perhaps Kafka doesn't measure up to Joyce, Proust or Dante, but Wilson included Gertrude Stein in Axel's Castle. He swallowed her without a burp even though the only work he appreciated was her Three Lives. He was very critical of all her other works. Does he think Stein a major writer? If she is there because of her influence, surely Kafka has been more influential than Stein -- not in 1931 perhaps, but later on. But aside from that, what does it mean to question whether Kafka is a "major writer"? Can one call Gerard Manly Hopkins a Major Poet? His production is slim and yet many of his poems are first rate, better (in my opinion) than anything Eliot wrote, and more original as well, but Wilson would call Eliot a Major Poet or Writer. He likes his Prufrock but doesn't think his Wasteland or Ash Wednesday quite measure up, and while he doesn't really agree with Eliot's criticism he grants it a major influence. Why not grant Kafka a major influence? Maybe I should reread some Kafka. :-( Lawrence