> [Original Message] > From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 9/15/2005 5:35:02 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Violence as Destruction of Doubt > > > It's interesting that people who are convinced of the existence of that > > which can't be seen or empirically experienced, i.e., supernatural beings > > such as God and the like, are so dead set against unconscious motivation. > > What is it that specifically bothers you about unconscious motivation? In > > the absence of unconscious motivation, how do you explain human behavior > > Phil, when so much of it is counterintuitive and counterproductive? Yeah, > > it's a big question, but it's answerable. I see this as much a > > science/religion struggle as Darwinism/I.D. Likewise Eric. You put this > > down every time it's posted, but you don't offer anything in its place. > > Ideas? > > Ideas? Yes: the ability to recognize patent nonsense is a useful skill. > Okay, then, explain it in a sensible way. > Robert Paul > Reed College > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html