Dear Dr. Jost, the burden is on you. I have no idea of the why or indeed whether Pythagora's theorem is a "noumena." Indeed I have a very hard time in understanding what such an arcane wording entails. You may want to ask how does x knows that P [p= the theorem aforementioned] is a noumena. I myself being very untrained in the vagaries of such claims as the "faith" und so weiter, have no idea. If you care to explain, I'd be grateful. In particular :noumena = ?? If a subject knows or states the subject knows that alpha is noumena, what does the subject know? When the subject knows that p is noumena, assuming knowledge entails true content, what are the truth conditions of "p is noumena"? Best -----Original Message----- From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Sent: 08 September 2014 21:32 To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Vedr: Three arguments against quantitative social "science" as science >> neither the photons nor anyone else could care less about my >> imagination That may well be. However to speak of something without reference to empiricism (initial instant of Big Bang, God, Captain Ahab, quarks, etc.) is to claim direct knowledge of a noumena, which is type of faith or imaginative leap. While I agree that the natural world exists without reference to our species, it's equally clear that when a member of our species makes truth claims about the world, that human being has created an imaginative mental construct, so as to share it with another human and claim its truth. In other words, Pythagoras's theorem may be true independent of people, true before it was named, true before humans, eternally true, but the naming of it, and its transmission from generation to generation via an imagined planar space, is an act of imagination and faith. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html