[lit-ideas] Re: Vacuous Names

  • From: "Adriano Palma" <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:38:57 +0200

** Low Priority **
** Reply Requested by 6/11/2012 (Monday) **

no, it is from john 18, and it was in aristotle
the so called philosophy of science is way behind the curve

>>> "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> 11/06/2012 12:06 AM >>>
AP: unfortunately it is the BOME (the Bane Of My Existence) that people
have no clue as to what a theory of truth does.

Isn't that a central conundrum of philosophy of science? At least as
regards how far an explanation (or theory of truth, especially a
positivist theory) may "stand behind" empirical data?

Still stuck on the "Grue" problem,
muddling and adding banes

To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/

Other related posts: