[lit-ideas] Re: US Congress and the Israeli Attack on Lebanon

  • From: "Stan Spiegel" <writeforu2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:19:17 -0400

Simon writes:
Omar did not write the paragraph you refer to. The author, one Stephen
Zunes, the Editor, John Feffer, and the source, Foreign Policy In Focus, are
all clearly included at the top of the post.

SS writes:
One thing I've learned about Omar, Simon, is that he never shares an article with which he doesn't agree 100%. He's not sending articles to stimulate us. He's sending them as an extension of himself. It's a good way for him to hide his anti-semitism. It gives him plausible deniability. Omar's a very bright guy. He doesn't need you to defend him, which you do continually. How come?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:46 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: US Congress and the Israeli Attack on Lebanon



Stan,

Omar did not write the paragraph you refer to. The author, one Stephen Zunes, the Editor, John Feffer, and the source, Foreign Policy In Focus, are all clearly included at the top of the post.

Simon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan Spiegel" <writeforu2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 6:39 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: US Congress and the Israeli Attack on Lebanon



Omar:

"On July 20, the U.S. House of Representatives, by an
overwhelming 410-8 margin, voted to unconditionally
endorse Israel's ongoing attacks on Lebanon and the
Gaza Strip. The Senate passed a similar resolution
defending the Israeli attack earlier in the week by a
voice vote, but included a clause that "urges all
sides to protect innocent civilian life and
infrastructure." By contrast, the House version omits
this section and even praises Israel for "minimizing
civilian loss," despite overwhelming evidence to the
contrary. The resolution also praises President George
W. Bush for "fully supporting Israel," even though
Bush has blocked diplomatic efforts for a cease-fire
and has isolated the United States in the
international community by supporting the Israeli
attacks."

Interesting, Omar. In this little paragraph you refer over and over again to Israeli "attacks," as if Israel is the aggressor. Cause and effect doesn't seem to be part of your vocabulary. Anytime Israel is involved in a problem, it's always Israel at fault. You seem very able to block out important parts of the conflict.

I'm not sure that's such a virtue.

In your relationships, Omar, are you just as capable of blocking out your own contribution to any conflict? Is every problem always the "other person's fault" in your life too?

I'm glad I'm not part of your personal life!

Stan Spiegel
Portland, Maine


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: