[lit-ideas] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: On the bearing
- From: "Donal McEvoy" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "donalmcevoyuk" for DMARC)
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
another instance of right wing machismo,>
Not really. I was just looking for a quotation or reference which would
indicate that Churchill's argument is a "rehash", and unoriginal. Perhaps there
are so many, we are paralysed for choice - and that explains why this simple
request goes unanswered as yet.
Palma talks of "no mistakes"; pace Palma, there admittedly are some in Popper's
published work, like his definition of verisimilitude (I've mentioned this one
before).
But some mistakes are clear cut and easily established, and others neither. A
good thing about my request is that, if it is a "rehash" and Popper mistakes
Churchill's originality, it should be easy enough to provide a
quotation/reference that shows Popper's mistake in this regard. Unless we are
to believe that Churchill's "cross-bearing" precursors worked solely in an oral
tradition, like Homer.
DL
From: adriano paolo shaul gershom palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 26 January 2018, 8:07
Subject: [lit-ideas] On the bearing
popper overlooked nothing, popper made no mistakes, popper is was will be right
the current job is to kiss popper's typewriter
Other related posts: