[lit-ideas] Re: Twitter
- From: Andy <min.erva@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
I meant to say gratuitous and tasteless.
Andy <min.erva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't have that issue handy but I suspect the alleged remarks by Peter
and Gordon are a gratuitous damper on the subject under discussion. One
wonders what the point of the damper is.
David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Andy wrote:
> I have no idea what this means and wonder why this was addressed at my
> post. If in fact it is in the current issue, how does it relate to
> what's being discussed?
>
Open the April 30th issue at page six, the one with the lovely
cover--two people staring not at a Pollock-like painting which dwarfs
them, but instead at a tiny digital camera's screen, on which the
painting is reproduced-- and you will see I was referring to
correspondence in response to Colapinto's article. The second letter
is from Peter Gordon of Columbia University. It apologizes to "the
people of Appalachia" for "remarks [that] have added to... negative and
untrue stereotypes."
David Ritchie,
Portland, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Other related posts:
