> >That > > there are 'four basic (sic) ways' for people to express their emotions > > needs some evidence. I think it can be argued that there are three basic *negative* emotions, to whit - anger, sadness, anxiety [all 'dysphoria' to the Greeks]. There are many, many ways of *expressing* these emotions. It is a mistake to regard the possible limited number of types of emotion as setting a limit to the ways of expressing these emotions. >Why the 20th century was the > bloodiest in history, and on and on. Because of mass destruction and mass population. Yet, per capita - and war aside, the murder rate has gone down markedly in the last several centuries. >We think in words. If we don't > have a language, we literally can't think. We sometimes think in words, but many of our thoughts are not in words - for example, I could recognise [in thought]if the creases in my trousers were altered even if I would struggle to describe in language the differing character of the creases. I might clearly recognise my assailant though I would struggle to describe him in language that would clearly allow another to recognise him (that's why the police hire artists to translate such descriptions into a picture). To think all thought is language-dependent is just one of the prejudices of the cunning linguists who have deformed rational thought on this topic. Donal Hi Mike Nice poem England ___________________________________________________________ Switch an email account to Yahoo! Mail, you could win FIFA World Cup tickets. http://uk.mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html