________________________________ From: Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> >If somebody could explain to me (us) what "philosophical logic" is supposed to be about, then perhaps I (the rest of us) could weigh in on the matter of whether Witters was right in denying or questioning its existence, and the possible relevance of the expresion to what he understood his book to be about. (Not that author's have any privileged insight into the meaning of their texts of course. Gadamer da da da! But that's just if you ask me.) > Several of my posts have made a similar or the same point, but perhaps hope of explanation is forlorn: "Whereof Wittgensteinians cannot explain, thereof they shall typically remain silent". Donal London