In a message dated 12/3/2004 9:11:27 PM Central Standard Time, phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: I would just add that it is virtually unthinkable that the US would not maintain some military presence in Iraq. Hi, I think they will always, from now until they are dry, control the oil fields and the military bases they have built... If you read about the bases they have built with the swimming pools, great R and R areas for the troops to go to after their work freeing the nation of Iraq [while not far away there is no water to drink if you are five years old]--well, definitely you can see the hearts and minds and souls of our military. They DO deserve the best, though, since they are defending democracy. (not protecting history or the people but they have been busy defending democracy. NOT fighting terrorists who took down the Twin Towers--but hey. Defending democracy is important too. Surely the ends justifies the means, right?) We have already let the history of Iraq be so plundered that it is unlikely to ever recover. (has anyone else but me been keeping up on that part of the Iraqi world? The black market is thriving with artifacts stolen and allowed to be stolen...) There is not much left, so why should we stay, at this point? We've stolen (or allowed to be stolen) the artifacts, bombed the historical sites, killed the young ones, created a disaster (so so cavalier to say that they 'want' civil war...but I fear that the attitude towards Iraqis is such that they are, after all, like little children who cannot govern/rule themselves (We did, after all, have to save them from a tyrant--and their lives are so so much healthier for it. It meant, after all, running water, food on the table, freedom to walk the streets, girls to attend college, a wonderful medical world--the best in the Middle East just as it was even under the tyrant, etc etc. Oh, yes. We did so so much good there and they are but barbarians who now cannot figure out how to rule themselves...) I do agree--the US *will* leave, we will still make them pay for the reconstruction of the destruction we wrought on them, and we will be extremely irritated at them if they are not suitably grateful. But, 'our boys' will be back and we pretty much will forget that we had a hand in destroying so much of an ancient civilization. We will have 'won' (well, we already have, after all) and that is all that matters. Just because the Taliban have retaken many parts of southern Afghanistan, drug-dealing is at some of the highest levels there, women are still in pretty horrible horrific situations, etc etc. -- does not negate that the US has freed Afghanistan and has cleansed it from all problems. We are heroes there, you know. What slays me, now, is the whining from my neighbors (you remember, the Bush supporters) as they have been getting the cute little slips from the Social Security Administration in the mail and casually and jokingly stating that it might be the last one they see. Who do they think said he would privatize Social Security (at the cost now estimated at 1 trillion dollars)? I really have not figured out what to say to them--but I do wonder why they would tell ME their feelings when they know that it is Pres Bush and his cronies who are involved? People. Wondering at the hearts of our Leaders (and wondering if next life that they get to be the Iraqis...ever supposing that my theology is as true as theirs...<wry look>), Marlena in Missouri ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html