Sunday, December 12, 2004, 6:06:31 AM, Lawrence Helm wrote: LH> Note: the person who wrote the article for TWS, Robert Barro, is a Prof= essor LH> from Harvard who doesn=92t work for TWS. Here is the same author writi= ng a LH> similar article for Business Week: Here's the Barro Business Week piece. It's no basis on which to assess the= Groseclose/Milyo paper. =20 The Liberal Media: It's No Myth =0B=0BMany people think the mainstream medi= a have a liberal bias. Media spokesmen, however, usually deny such claims. = So who's right? Is there a left-wing bias, or has the right wing conspired = not only to influence the media but also to create a false image of unfairn= ess? Some scientific evidence is available in a continuing study, A Measure= of Media Bias, by Tim Groseclose of the University of California at Los An= geles and Jeff Milyo of the University of Chicago, presented last March at = Stanford University's Workshop on the Media & Economic Performance. These r= esearchers set up an objective measure of bias in U.S. television networks,= newspapers, and magazines. The main finding is that the liberal inclinatio= n is pronounced. Although Fox News emerges as conservative, it is not nearl= y as far to the right as many outlets are to the left.=20 LH> Here is the entire Gosclose-Milyo analysis s it was published in Septem= ber LH> 2003: I can't see where it was published -- it's simply a .doc or .html -- I quot= e their account of their method: >>>>>>>>>>>> To compute our measure, we count the times that a media outlet cites variou= s think tanks. We compare this with the times that members of Congress cite= the same think tanks in their speeches on the floor of the House and Senat= e. By comparing the citation patterns we can construct an ADA score for eac= h media outlet.=20 >>>>>>>>>>> and their further explanation >>>>>>>>>>>> As a simplified example, imagine that there were only two think tanks, one = liberal and one conservative. Suppose that the New York Times cited the lib= eral think tank twice as often as the conservative one. Our method asks: Wh= at is the estimated ADA score of a member of Congress who exhibits the same= frequency (2:1) in his or her speeches? This is the score that our method = would assign to the New York Times.=20 >>>>>>>>> and their >>>>>>>>>>> A feature of our method is that it does not require us to make a subjective= assessment of how liberal or conservative a think tank is. That is, for in= stance, we do we need to read policy reports of the think tank or analyze i= ts position on various issues to determine its ideology. Instead, we simply= observe the ADA scores of the members of Congress who cite the think tank.= This feature is important, since an active controversy exists whether, e.g= ., the Brookings Institution or the RAND Corporation is moderate, left-wing= , or right-wing.=20 >>>>>>>> LH>The following is Milyo responding to a criticism of the analysis: I've read the critique -- it's at http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001169.html =20 LH> Here is a Pew Research Center Analysis on the much the same subject: it's about the media and partisanship, yes, but doesn't make the point/s th= at are in Groseclose/Milyo -- it's about views of the media -- but it's wor= th looking at it. LH>Here is an NCPA Analysis on the same subject. This is largely a summary of Groseclose/Milyo. Tim Groseclose is an Associate Professor of Political Economy at Stanford's= Business School. He does public choice stuff. Jeffrey Milyo's an Assistan= t Professor in Public Policy Studies at Chicago, he's public policy/politic= al economy. I think he, too, is a public choice person. IOW neither is an e= xpert on the mass media. --=20 Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK =20 mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html