"But suppose that it could be shown that, in the wake of all previous experience, the field which remains available for scientific cultivation is already occupied by the appropriate sciences and that there appears to be only one uncultivated plot remaining, namely, the one marked out for the science of science as such. An suppose, furthermore, that under a familiar name ("philosophy") one discovers the idea of a science, that is, the idea of something which wishes to be or to become a science, but which cannot decide where it should take root. In this case it would not be improper to direct it toward the empty plot we have discovered. It is immaterial whether or not people have always meant precisely this by the word "philosophy". Afterward, this science (if philosophy ever becomes a science) will be justified in casting off a few names which it has previously assume out of a (a by no means exaggerated) modesty: the names "esoteric amusement," "hobby,", and "diletantism." The nation [and this is the best part] which discovered this science would deserve to give it a name in its own language, in which case it could be called simply "science" or [...]" -------------------------------------- Have you read Luck Jim? ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html