The thing that I don't understand at all, is how you can spend that much on healthcare and still not have universal coverage? From OECD Observer, page 8 - 9 (http://oecdpublications.gfi-nb.com/cgi-bin/OECDBookShop.storefront/EN/product/012004071E1) 2002 figures: USA Total healthcare expenditure: 14.6% GDP, $5267 per capita Of that public expenditure: 44.9%, which means 6.6% GDP and $2364 per capita UK 7.7 GDP, $2160 84.4, 6.5 GDP, $1823 France (often consider best care in Europe) 9.7 GDP, $2736 76%, 7.4 GDP, $2079 And rest of the OECD falls in line. So it shouldn't be a financing issue. Perplexed, Teemu Helsinki, Finland --- Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Saturday, November 20, 2004, 10:02:14 PM, Mike Geary > wrote: > > > MG> Here's the reply Reply. It isn't Texascare, > it's TennCare -- Tennessee > > sorry -- I read the piece (NYT?) rather too fast. > > > I > MG> know a couple of people who are extremely > distraught over the coming > MG> abandonment of TennCare. Friends who take > psychopharmaceuticals worth a > MG> thousand dollars plus a month. There's no way > they can afford that and they > MG> earn over the Medicaid cut-off income level. > > > Yes. The article I read quoted a woman who needs > medication that costs more than $1000 a month. It's > terrible. > > > > Maybe they'll flip out without > MG> their meds and uzi out the entire government. > I'd support that. > > not such a bad idea > > > > > -- > Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK > mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html