Wednesday, November 24, 2004, 3:52:32 PM, Veronica Caley wrote: VC> It's ok Robert.=20 you think we forgive him? :) VC> Just take care of yourself. yes indeed. =20 VC> I am thinking that the Tennessee situation is not Medicare but Medicaid. Yes it is (I always mix them up, I had to check))-- that is, it's a "better= Medicaid" -- but some states seem to combine aspects of both. Here's TennC= are: *** The mission of TennCare is to facilitate a system of effective healthcare w= ithin a predictable budget for Tennesseans who are Medicaid eligible or who= lack access to health insurance. ***=0B VC> The Federal Government used to give the States separate amounts of money VC> for various programs, one of which was Medicaid. Now they took Medicaid VC> and other programs and give one sum and since it's a significantly lower VC> amount, it's up to the States to divide it up. So every program gets l= ess. VC> Medicaid is for the very poor and handicapped rather than just the elde= rly VC> and orphans, which is Medicare. VC> Also, in many States, there is an income tax that follows the same form= ula VC> as the Federal Income Tax. Since the Congress has been into big time t= ax VC> cutting, the States collect less as well. =20 I see. We don't have the low tax problem here (!) -- I didn't know States = were tied to federal tax practice in that way, that's bad news. --=20 Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK =20 mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html