Robert Paul wrote: "The Pronoun Wars have given us 'If a person has measles then their skin will have spots,' 'If someone exercises vigorously, they will sweat,' and other infelicities, but to object to them is to appear to be a curmudgeon or worse, not as regards grammar but as regards sexual equality." "Though the masculine singular personal pronoun may survive awhile longer as a generic term, it will probably be displaced ultimately by _they_, which is coming to be used alternatively as singular or plural. This usage is becoming commonplace. Speakers of American English resist this development more than speakers of British English, in which the indeterminate _they_ is already more or less standard. That it sets many literate Americans' teeth on edge is an unfortunate setback to what promises to be the ultimate solution to the problem." (From the entry 'Sexism' in Bryan Garner's "The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style") But then Garner is a descriptivist so perhaps Prof. Paul finds himself more in sympathy with Fowler, a prescriptivist curmudgeon? Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html