[lit-ideas] Re: The SCUD in a Box Scenario
- From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:32 EST
The world imitates the small ones.
It's all about money.
Everywnere
========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: The SCUD in a Box
Scenario Date: 2/27/06 10:18:24 A.M. Central Standard Time From:
_andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx) To:
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on:
Oh, Lawrence, here you go again. We went through this last week. Leftists,
Rightists,
defeatists, traitors, nationalists, patriots, etc... are all local politics
and those don't
matter anymore because the structure of the economy has changed.
yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 7:31 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The SCUD in a Box Scenario
>I don't believe that's true. The U.S. Isn't single-minded. It's got its
> Leftists who would like to see the U.S. defeated, the descendents of those
> who gave "big bad Russia" nukes to aim at us so we would have to aim nukes
> at them; they have always wanted to see the U.S. disarmed. It's got its
> pacifists who don't want to fight any war with anyone; they would like to
> see us get rid of our nukes. It's got its Globalizers, its Wendell
Wilkie's
> "One-Worlders" whose loyalty is to the world and not to any nation; they
> would like to see all weapons kept to a bare minimum and see no need for
> Nukes. Our Hamiltonians could want nukes to protect their business
> interests abound the world, but with enough assurance that they don't need
> them, they could be induced to give them up. Some of our Jacksonians, who
> are isolationists at heart, might want to keep them because they pretty
much
> don't trust the rest of the world and would need a very good reason to
give
> up the nukes, but they don't trust our government all that much either and
> wouldn't be surprised if they were outvoted and their nukes destroyed.
>
>
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Paul Stone
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 7:13 AM
> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The SCUD in a Box Scenario
>
>
>
> At 09:56 AM 2/27/2006, you wrote:
>
>
>
> Omar: Is there a scenario for eliminating the US nuclear weapons ?
>
> Lawrence: When the world is utterly at peace with no more Islamists, no
more
> rogue states like North Korea or Iran, and a reliable means for checking
and
> stopping a nation with roguish designs from developing nuclear weapons, the
> U.S. would in a Fukuyamian future be willing to get rid of its nuclear
> weapons as the last nation who has them.
>
>
> They might be 'able' to do it, but they certainly never WOULD. Do you
> actually believe they REALLY disarmed all those thousands of nukes they had
> aimed at big bad Russia in the 70s? Of course not, they just re-aimed them.
> There will NEVER be a day without nuclear weapons. It'd be too dangerous.
>
> p
>
>
>
> ##########
> Paul Stone
> pas@xxxxxxxx
> Kingsville, ON, Canada
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 2/24/2006
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
