[lit-ideas] Re: "The Philosophical Anthropologist"
- From: John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:17:25 +0900
A plain, straightforward request for a definition. The philosopher who
denies that experience is evidence is surely obliged to provide some
argument for this extraordinary proposition.
Not insisting, mind you, that all experience meet legal, scientific, or even
theological, criteria for evidence. Just wondering what Enns thinks he is
saying.
John
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John McCreery wrote:
>
> "What, then, is it?"
>
>
> Is that a philosophical or sociological question?
>
>
> Phil Enns
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
Tel. +81-45-314-9324
jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wordworks.jp/
Other related posts:
