[lit-ideas] Re: "The Philosophical Anthropologist"

  • From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:23:03 -0500


----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:03 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: "The Philosophical Anthropologist"


John McCreery wrote:

"How is 'what is given to us in experience' different from the
evidence used in empirical research?"

One difference would be that, for philosophy, what is given by
experience is not evidence.


John:

"How is 'to think philosophically' different from to think
sociologically, for example?"

Philosophers don't think of experience in terms of evidence and
empirical research?


Sincerely,

Phil Enns
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: